Return to Sermon Page

Return Home

Sermon for October 31, 2004

 

 

  “The quest of truth is its sacrament.”  This statement, of course, is part of our affirmation of faith.  It is part of what we are about as a church.   

But as simple and innocuous a phrase as “the quest of truth” is, it is a phrase that is loaded with difficulty and one that has occupied my thoughts over the last few weeks.

It has occupied my thoughts because it provokes a number of questions.  The first of these is whether or not it is possible to find the truth.  By truth, of course, we don’t mean mundane truths but truths about the very structure of reality, the purpose of our lives, the nature and reality of the spiritual.

Is it possible to know such things?  Is it possible to do more than make hopeful guesses? 

For most religions this is not a problem.  They see the truth as a body of beliefs that is passed from generation to generation.  For them, truth is a settled matter.  It’s received.  Somebody else got it, and their only responsibility is to accept it as a matter of faith. 

We, on the other hand, reject the notion that some other generation could discover truth, but we cannot; that certain special people could find it, but we cannot.  As Ralph Waldo Emerson asks, “Why shouldn’t we have a religion by revelation to us?” 

But let’s be honest.  We have put ourselves in a rather awkward position.  We say we’re looking for something, but we are not entirely certain it can be found. 

Of course, the real question here is whether humans have the capacity to learn the truth about spiritual things or have we been left in a universe that we are unable to explain, without guidance for our behavior, without any knowledge of our ultimate purpose or destination?  Is there any evidence that we do have a capacity for truth?

Karl Jung, the famous psychoanalyst, may help us here.  He speaks of three layers of the human psyche- the conscious mind, the personal unconscious (the things we have forgotten or repressed), and the deepest layer, the collective unconscious.  By collective unconscious he doesn’t mean that we all are mysteriously connected to each other, but that there are certain basic ideas and patterns inscribed upon the human mind.  These patterns or motifs emerge in myths and stories all over the earth.  They are not learned but are more akin to the nest-building behavior of birds.  They are innate; we just have them.

These patterns or motifs produce myths and stories that serve an important purpose.  They  enable us to understand our lives and to live life more fully and more authentically.  They tell us about the nature of reality, the purpose and goal of our lives.  They tell us about the spiritual principles that underlie reality, that shape our world and effect the way life unfolds and develops.  In sum, they give us insight into the very moral and spiritual order that guides our world. 

According to Jung, we need these myths and stories.  We need the principles they teach.  To ignore these principles is to risk neurotic and even psychotic disorders.  Remarkably, according to Jung, we all have some sort of unconscious sense of these principles; of the structure of life; of how this universe unfolds; of what moral and logical rules seem to guide it. 

Joseph Campbell gives a good example of this in his famous work, The Hero with a Thousand Faces.  As Campbell searched through the myths and stories of heroes and heroines in hundreds of cultures, he discovered that they all shared the same basic features.  Our life is a quest. We are all called to that quest.  We have what we need to succeed in this quest.  As we proceed we will find unexpected help along the way and the prize we win is always for others.  Campbell also points out that we can refuse the adventure but we then will lead an impoverished existence. 

Like Jung’s principles, the story of the hero is a story about how we are to live our lives.  It is a story we know deep within ourselves.  When we see its principles, embrace them and live them, we become fully alive.  We discover our purpose and we discover ourselves.  The story of the hero also tells us something about the way the world is structured.  When we give ourselves to the adventure to which we have been called, we discover that the universe itself has equipped us for the adventure and actively helps us on our way. 

The story of the hero is a story of the hidden structure of reality; of the intersection of the spiritual and the material. 

It seems then that we do know some things; that there is at least some capacity within the human soul for discerning the truth, and that truth is expressed in a thousand ways in a thousand stories and traditions. 

So how would we go about searching for the truth?  The work of Jung and Campbell suggest that we should look at the various mythological and religious traditions in the world.  We should examine them and see the basic principles they present.  We should fit them together to give us insight and direction.  We should try to create a synthesis of insights from various religions.  We could also draw lessons from psychology and philosophy, from anthropology and mythology.  We could try to discover the spiritual principles that influence our world, that can guide our lives, that are the hidden side of reality.  We can do this by listening carefully to the human soul. 

From these we could try to construct a theology.  Not some cold anatomical analysis of the divine.  We would not be looking to dissect the divine, but to discover its footprints upon the world.  We would seek a theology that explains life, that gives us a way of understanding our place in this world and help us to live more fully in it.

This will be a new and unique thing.  It will be an attempt to not just nibble around the edges of various traditions, but to forge a new one comprised of the insights of many traditions and that draws upon the broad richness of human experience. 

But how would we know that what we find is in fact the truth?  How would we know that we are not merely making arrogant guesses about the nature of the spiritual?  Let me offer a few possible criteria and an example or two. 

First of all, truth must match our experience.  For example, the Christian concept of a God who controls everything and at the same time is absolutely good simply fails to meet the test of reality.  The truth is, terrible things happen.  Evil does exist.  And Christian apologists, who claim that God is good and in control of everything, ultimately are left saying that things only look evil to us; that if we only had a better perspective we would see that everything that happens is really part of some mysterious plan.  Events like the holocaust make it rather clear that God cannot be both good and in control of everything.  The popular Christian idea of God is simple inadequate.

At the same time, to take the existence of evil as proof of the non- existence of God  is to ignore the spiritual experiences of millions; experiences that have transformed individuals and have no explanation unless there really is a spiritual realm. 

So perhaps it is better to understand the spiritual as influencing our word, yet not controlling it.  It may be better to see the spiritual as touching our lives, not running them.  I like to think of the spiritual as seeping or bleeding into the material.  It’s there, it has an effect, it provides some guiding principles, yet remains apart.  It may put ideas in our hearts, it may inspire and even help us, but ultimately our world stands on its own.  We make the choices and our choices can do great good or great evil.     

A second criteria we might use to determine whether something is truth is by its effect on us.  The theologian Roger Haight wrote a book some years back called The Language and Experience of Grace in which he analyzed various people’s religious experiences and discovered that for every one of them, the result of their experience was personal liberation and growth in their ability to love and care for others.  If the world is influenced by the spiritual, and if that power is good, then the discovery of those spiritual principles should free us.  We should live lives that that more complete.  We should be better people. 

A final criteria is our own reaction to the truth when we hear it.  Truth should resonate within our hearts.  We should recognize it when we hear it.  There are times in each of our lives when someone has said something to us and we know, “Yes. That’s right!”  A few weeks ago one of our guests told how she was working as a volunteer with some homeless youth and one of her successes told her that he wouldn’t have made it without her.  Suddenly knew that this was her calling, this was her adventure.  She left her job and devoted herself to the work full-time.  

Truth has that effect.  It’s call is clear.  I’m not sure how that happens, but I know it happens and I suspect it happens because our hearts are designed to recognize the truth. 

Her story confirms something about life and the world that we’ve already said.  There are principles that we can discover, that there is purpose and direction for each of us, and that there is within each of us the capacity to discover truth. 

Of course,  we don’t always recognize truth.  We can get its way.  We can already be so sure of what is true and be so sure we know the ways things really are, that truth is unable to reach us.  As Chuang Tzu, the Taoist master says, sometimes what you unlearn is more important that what you learn. 

The quest for truth will not be easy.  To explore various traditions and disciplines, to try to draw insights from them, to see below the surface of things to those spiritual principles that seep into the world, that influence it, will be difficult.  Yet it is a task that I think is worth doing. 

We may also have disagreements along the way.  But that’s okay.   UU churches are supposed to be a place where people can have different opinions, where they can talk about them and walk away still disagreeing yet be committed to come back and talk about them some more (and disagree some more).  In fact, UU churches are places where we never have to agree, but where we are committed to listen and to think.  I would invite you to use our coffee time to talk about these things, to express your agreements and your differences.   The dialogue we have with each other is an important part of the quest for truth, as is our willingness to honestly and respectfully listen to each other.



Return to Sermon Page

Return Home

setstats 1